<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277691">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Love Epistle by &quot;Chaucer.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes and edits an anonymous lyric, here titled &quot;An epistle to his mistress for remembrance,&quot; spuriously attributed to Chaucer in Trinity College Cambridge 599 (R. 3. 19).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277690">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Second Nun&#039;s Tale: Tiburce&#039;s Visit to Pope Urban.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that details and source material make clear that the description of Tiberce&#039;s visit to Pope Urban in SNT 8.352-53 indicates Tiburce received the sacrament of Confirmation as well as the sacrament of Baptism.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277689">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Notes on the Canterbury Tales (3)]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores nuances of &quot;tregetour&quot; in FranT 5.1141 and 1143; HF 1260 and 1277, arguing that their magic would have been understood by Chaucer and his original audience to entail illusion rather than mechanical contrivance or sleight of hand.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277688">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Cherles Rebellyng.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Resists editorial glossing of &quot;cherles rebelling&quot; (KnT 1.2459) as &quot;an allusion to the Peasants&#039; Revolt of 1381,&quot; offering other possibilities from commentaries on Saturn&#039;s astrological influence.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277687">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Euphemistic Allusion to the &quot;Reeve&#039;s Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Identifies several previously unnoticed references and allusions to Chaucer in Nathaniel Whiting&#039;s &quot;I1 Insonio Insonadado&quot; (1638), including two euphemisms for the sexual revenge in RvT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277686">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Canterbury Tales&quot;: Aesthetic Design in Stories of the First Day.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Articulates a number of parallels and contrasts among the tellers and tales of KnT, MilT, RvT, and CkT, focusing on character, accident versus fate, intention, and paradox. Emphasizing the Knight&#039;s &quot;chivalric idealism&quot; and the &quot;strong earthiness&quot; of the other tellers, examines how mirroring patterns within their tales &quot;accentuate the contrast in the ideals and characters of the pilgrims.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277685">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[&quot;Sir Thopas&quot; as Criticism of Fourteenth-Century Minstrelsy.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that minstrelsy is the major target of Chaucer&#039;s burlesque in Tho--a &quot;penetrating criticism of oral literary art&quot; that is consistent with Chaucer&#039;s &quot;position as a man of letters.&quot; Maintains that Tho and its juxtaposition with Mel indicate Chaucer&#039;s disdain for oral poetry, even more than for extant popular romances.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277684">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Chaucerian Emendation.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Suggests possible versions of &quot;sorowe&quot; for &quot;soor&quot; in KnT 1.1454.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277683">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Story of Troilus and Briseida According to Benoit and Guido.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Exploring multiple intertextualities between versions of the story of Troilus and Briseida in Benoit and Guido, mentions points of similarity in the exchange-of-prisoners scene where both Boccaccio (Filostrato) and Chaucer (TC) &quot;adapted and modified&quot; details introduced by Guido.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277682">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Aspects of the Relationship of Boccaccio&#039;s &quot;Il Filostrato&quot; with Benoit&#039;s &quot;Roman de Troie&quot; and Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Wife of Bath&#039;s Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores the influence of Diomede&#039;s wooing in Benoit&#039;s &quot;Roman&quot; on Boccaccio&#039;s &quot;Filostrato&quot; and the &quot;probable connection&quot; between the lecture on gentility in the latter and in WBT, particularly 3.1113-24.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277681">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[William Penn and Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Identifies and assesses two previously unnoticed Chaucer allusions in William Penn&#039;s &quot;Treatise of Oaths&quot; (1675).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277680">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[An Interpretation of the &quot;Clerk&#039;s Tale&quot; According to Mediaeval Literary Theory: Based on a Study of Sources and Analogues.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Identifies concerns with patience and marriage in sources and analogues of ClT, and explores the status of these concerns in medieval scriptural commentaries. Argues that ClT presents a clearly orthodox view of marriage which underlies the Clerk&#039;s rejection of the Wife&#039;s unorthodoxy.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277679">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Rhetorical Word-Play in Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys critics&#039; attention to Chaucer&#039;s word-play, and shows through multiple examples that such play is more common in his works than previously observed, especially his early works. Clarifies kinds of word-play in medieval rhetoric and literature--discussing &quot;adnominatio,&quot; &quot;traductio,&quot; &quot;rime riche,&quot; and double entendre (&quot;significatio&quot;), and focuses on Chaucer&#039;s emulations of such &quot;rhetorical trickery&quot; as it described in rhetorical handbooks and exemplified in French poetry.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277678">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Troilus and Criseyde: &quot;A Most Admirable and Epicke Poeme.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Framed as justification for Sir Francis Kynaston&#039;s 1636 praise of TC as an epic poem, this essay analyzes themes, characterizations, and the ending of Chaucer&#039;s poem in light of Renaissance perspectives, especially on love.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277677">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Nun&#039;s Priest&#039;s Tale: For Chorus and Orchestra.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Item not seen.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277676">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Troilus&#039; Confession.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Suggests that aspects of the ritual of sacramental confession are noticeable in the fabricated version of Troilus&#039;s admission of love that Pandarus reports to Criseyde in TC 2.523ff. Also notes other echoes of confession in Books 1 and 2 that Chaucer&#039;s audience was likely to notice.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277675">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Use of &quot;Gan.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Analyzes Chaucer&#039;s use of the auxiliary verb &quot;ginnan&quot;/&quot;gan,&quot; a periphrastic preterit, in contrast with simple preterits, to produce &quot;distinctions in tempo, intensity, and manner.&quot; Comments on examples such as &quot;gan behold&quot;/&quot;beheld&quot;, &quot;gan to turne&quot;/ turned,&quot; &quot;gan he stalke&quot;/&quot;stalked,&quot; etc., gauging stylistic effects in various contexts, and comparing Chaucer&#039;s usage with those of other Middle English writers. Suggests &quot;the &#039;gan&#039; form of the preterit functioned as aspect instead of as a tense identical to the simple preterit.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277674">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Prologue to Pilgrimage: The Two Voices.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explicates the unity or the &quot;designed togetherness&quot; of GP, focusing on various pairings and oppositions as they evoke and engage varieties of love (heavenly and worldly in the Prioress), mature and youthful (Knight and Squire), clerical and secular (Parson and Plowman), justice and forgiveness (ironically, in the Summoner and Pardoner), and, overall, the restorative power of physical and spiritual pilgrimage. ]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277673">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Wariangles.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Offers historical &quot;bird-lore&quot; as evidence of the poisonousness of the &quot;wariangles&quot; (shrikes, or butcher-birds), cited in the description of the summoner in FrT 3.1408).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277672">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer: &quot;Heigh Ymaginacioun.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Suggests that &quot;Chauntecleer&#039;s dream . . . prophesied the col-fox&#039;s attack&quot; in NPT 73215-18, adducing the neo-Platonic tradition that associates &quot;the imagination with prophetic vision through dreams,&quot; and noting that Dante uses &quot;alta fantasia&quot; (&quot;high imagination&quot;) twice, in &quot;Purgatorio&quot; 17.25 and &quot;Paradiso&quot; 33.142.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277671">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Cock and the Fox.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Suggests that NPT &quot;reflects . . . the controversy which took place in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries between the secular clergy and the friars.&quot; Adduces use of the name &quot;Russell&quot; and several other parallels with French moralized analogues and antifraternal commentaries to argue that Chaucer&#039;s fox may be seen to &quot;represent Franciscan friars&quot; and the tale an allegorical affirmation of &quot;the traditional position of the secular clergy.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277670">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Case for Poetry, A New Anthology: Poems, Cases, Critiques.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Anthologizes selections from poems by British and American writers. arranged alphabetically by author, some accompanied by critical and pedagogical materials. Includes selections from GP: 1-78, 118-62, and 361-92 (opening, Knight, Prioress, and Wife of Bath, with bottom-of-page translations but no other apparatus.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277669">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Chaucer Allusion in Edward Du Bois&#039; &quot;Old Nick.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Identifies an approximate quotation from Chaucer&#039;s Pity in Edward Du Bois&#039;s satirical novel, &quot;Old Nick&quot; (1801), and suggests that it is &quot;in all probability the first quotation from Chaucer&#039;s works in prose fiction.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277668">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Does the Nun&#039;s Priest&#039;s Epilogue Contain a Link?]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reviews opinions about the textual status of NPE and six additional lines found in four manuscripts of the CT often thought to be spurious. Considering issues of tale order, sequence of composition, dramatic consistency, and authorial or scribal cancellation and/or adjustment, suggests that the link--with the six lines--is authorial, originally intended to link NPE with WBPT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://uchaucer.utsa.edu/items/show/277667">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Walter Roet and Philippa Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes records available in the &quot;Black Prince&#039;s Register&quot; that pertain to Walter Roet, a &quot;member of the family into which Chaucer married&quot; and, perhaps, a &quot;brother of Chaucer&#039;s wife&quot; Philippa.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>